Certainly this is reflective of the weakness of using creatinine and creatinine based estimates of GFR as our basis for determining renal function. Unfortunately there are limited clinically applicable alternatives. What do we tell these patients? Do they or do they not have kidney disease?
My approach is the following:
1. Authenticate renal function within the office practice to the extent possible.
2. Check Cockcroft Gault creatinine clearance
3. Check 24 hour or 12 hour urine creatinine clearance
4. Rule out rising creatinine within normal range by reviewing historical data if available
5. Rule out Microalbuminuria or Proteinuria as markers of intrinsic renal disease
6. Rule out CKD risk factors (Hypertension, Diabetes, etc)
7. Consider a renal U/S to evaluate renal size.
If all these data are within normal limits then I reassure the patient and suggest a 6 to 12 month follow up and will repeat the studies to confirm a normal picture. If there remains doubt an Iothalamate measured GFR needs to be obtained. The issue of estimated versus measured GFR is reviewed by Andrew Levey and Lesley Stevens in an excellent article in JASN last year.
For those athletes with elevated creatinine levels I recommend the same process making sure they: discontinue all NSAID use; do not take any creatine based dietary supplements; and limit their meat intake to reasonable levels before performing the testing.
David Steele MD.
From the article.
"……..it is now well recognized that there are many factors associated with the serum level of cystatin C other than GFR, but the mechanisms for these associations are not well understood."
how abt using cystatin and combined gfr equations..