Inequities in Home Dialysis Use and Potential Solutions

884 0

Katherine Rizzolo MD
Nephrology Fellow, University of Colorado
Twitter @katierizzolo

The 2019 Advancing American Kidney Health (AAKH) executive order set a goal: by 2025, 80% of incident patients with kidney failure should be treated with home dialysis therapies (peritoneal or home hemodialysis) or kidney transplantation. Though use of home therapies is increasing, this remains a lofty goal considering the current rate of dialysis. Per the most current 2020 USRDS data, only 11% of incident and 12.5% of prevalent patients with kidney failure on dialysis were treated with home dialysis.

The COVID-19 pandemic has amplified inequities in healthcare access for patients with kidney failure. (Novick et al ACKD 2020) Home dialysis, in theory, would be a solution to avoid the increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection faced by patients who use in-center dialysis. (Bourne Renal Fellow Network 2021) In this post we discuss barriers to home dialysis, racial disparities in home dialysis use in the United States, and propose solutions to make access to home dialysis more equitable.

Disparities in Home Dialysis Use

Black and Latinx patients have higher risk of kidney failure compared with White patients (3.4 and 1.5 times as high, respectively). Despite this, amongst prevalent kidney failure patients, 7.4% of Latinx and 7.3% of Black patients are on home therapies, compared with 9.3% of White patients. Amongst incident dialysis starts, 7% of Black patients and 10.4% of Latinx patients initiate with home therapies, compared with 11.6% of White patients. (USRDS data 2020)

Black patients with kidney failure are more likely to dialyze in dialysis units with worse than expected survival outcomes, and in units that do not have home dialysis capabilities. Lower levels of education, unemployment, lack of pre-dialysis care, large body composition, non-white race, low socioeconomic status, proximity to dialysis unit, and presence of diabetes all have been associated with lower use of home dialysis (Thamer et al AJKD 2000; Stack et al JASN 2002). Overall, these disparities have declined over time, which may in part be related to expansion of care access under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the changes to the ESRD care bundle in 2011, but inequities remain.

Two studies in 2016 afforded a glimpse of racial disparities in access to home dialysis in the US. Mehrotra et al looked at all incidence and prevalent dialysis starts from 2007 to 2011. Black and Latinx patients with kidney failure in the study were much less likely to be referred to a nephrologist, less likely to have private insurance, and were often younger with fewer comorbidities compared with White patients. All racial groups, including Black and Latinx groups had a lower use of home dialysis, and clinical/demographic factors could not completely explain this difference. Transfer to in-center hemodialysis was higher in the Black population on PD.  Notably, risk in death by modality was lower in every racial group compared with White patients.

Figure 1 Figure from Mehrotra et al JASN 2016. Odds ratio of PD (A) and HHD (B) of initiating dialysis by race.

Wallace et al investigated the inter-state variability in home dialysis modality use by race in 369,163 Medicare patients in 2012, also finding decreased use of home therapies in the Latinx/Black population. Black patients were 41% less likely to have used PD and 34% less likely to have used HHD; Latinx patients were 26% less likely to have used PD and 35% less likely to have used HHD. Overall, they found “near universal” underuse of home dialysis therapies by Black and Latinx patients in every state- thus, the issue of racial disparities in home dialysis is a national, not a state, issue.

Figure 2. Figure from Wallace et al Perit Dial Int 2017 . Heat maps representing peritoneal dialysis utilization ratios for Black (a) and Latinx (b) by state in the US.

In 2020, Shen et al reviewed incident dialysis modality use by race between 2005-2013, and noted similar socioeconomic and clinical disparities as observed previously. Overall, Black patients were 31% less likely to initiate on home dialysis modalities, Latinx were 19% less likely. Once attenuated by clinical and socioeconomic factors, this risk was smaller, but was still present: Black patients were 24% less likely and Latinx were 10% less likely to utilize home therapies. Looking at the change in modality use at 90 days, disparities became more pronounced as White patients changed to home therapies. Over years, use of home therapies in all groups increased, though the racial disparities remained.

Barriers to Home Dialysis

Barriers to home dialysis exist at the patient, provider, and system level. In the United States, home dialysis patients are on average wealthier, have higher levels of education, and more likely to have access to pre-dialysis care.(Stack et al JASN 2002, Castledine et al Neph Dial Transp 2013, Kutner et al Arch Intern Med 2011

Barriers at the Patient Level

Lack of social support or concerns for performing dialysis independently are commonly cited concerns with home dialysis. One study in the Netherlands noted the most commonly cited barriers to PD were related to lack of social support or worry about performing PD independently. Many patients who choose home-based dialysis prefer to have a care partner. (Jager et al AJKD 2004) Accordingly, many patients have fears of performing independently, including lack of confidence with therapy at home, issues with self-cannulation in HHD, or fear of a catastrophic event. (Cafazzo et al CJASN 2009) Notably, lack of family support is twice as likely to be cited as a barrier in low income households. (Prakash et al CJASN 2013)

Barriers at the Provider Level

Lack of pre-dialysis care, including dialysis modality education, may account for part of racial disparities observed in home dialysis use. Simply, patients are more likely to choose PD when they receive adequate education about it (Devoe et al AJKD 2016). Shen et al noted a higher number of Black (36%) and Latinx (38%) patients had not seen a nephrologist prior to dialysis initiation compared with White patients with kidney failure. Many Black patients with kidney failure do not live in areas that offer PD, and living in areas of linguistic isolation may play a role in decreased home dialysis used within the Latinx community. Without pre-dialysis nephrology care, patients are more likely to initiate dialysis suboptimally- e.g, inpatient, via central venous catheter, and/or not on their chosen modality. Though a small number of patients do switch later to home dialysis modalities, the majority remain on in-center hemodialysis. This is due to patient preference, modality indecision, logistical issues (such as PD catheter placement), lack of pre-dialysis nephrology follow-up, in addition to unanticipated dialysis initiation (Imbeault et al Can J Kidney Health Dis 2019).

Even with pre-dialysis care, many patients with kidney failure feel they have not been educated appropriately about home therapies or that they were allowed to make their own choice about treatment modality. (Walker et al Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016) Black and Latinx patients are more likely to use in center hemodialysis units who do not offer home therapies, which makes it more difficult to access quality information, encouragement, and support for home dialysis. One study, for example, showed HD medical directors, when compared with PD medical directors, may have staff with less training or may have less enthusiasm for home therapies; these providers were less likely to recommend home therapies (Shen et al CJASN 2019). This may be in part due to poor education of nephrology providers regarding dialysis modality treatment; despite gains in home dialysis education, home dialysis continues to be noted by nephrology fellows as a leading educational gap. (Rope et al JASN 2017)

Barriers at the System Level

Prior studies have shown a mixed association of lower socioeconomic status (SES) and lower home dialysis use. Insurance arrangements and patient contributions to care are more likely to affect Black and Hispanic patients, especially as these groups are more likely to be uninsured prior to dialysis initiation. In addition, costs associated with time off for training, transportation to training visits, or modifications made from home may represent a financial barrier. 

In one study, specific barriers to PD- such as environment and social support were more common amongst patients with lower income and education levels. (Prakash et al CJASN 2013) Shen et al found lower SES attenuated, but did not completely explain, racial disparities in home dialysis use. It is possible lower SES may affect the choice for home therapy- for example, less access to dialysis units that offer home options, inability to complete modality education due to work or family responsibilities, or space/housing issues necessary for home modalities. Notably, in Australia, higher SES is associated with lower PD utilization (Grace et al CJASN 2014), indicating more than socioeconomic status is at play. 

Potential Solutions to Inequity in Home Dialysis Access

Given the many financial and patient-centered benefits of home dialysis, many small investments could have a sizable impact on psychological, financial, and systemic barriers in addressing inequities.

Get the right message out 

Culture-concordant education could have a powerful impact on the Black and Latinx community with kidney failure. Education tailored to the culture and language of a racial group has been shown to affect visit adherence, medication adherence, and other health behaviors (Fischer et al J Pain Symptom Manage 2015). For example, education programs about living donor transplantation within the Black community has led to higher rates of living donor kidney transplantation. In the Latinx community, mass media interventions, culturally tailored websites, and living education sessions improved attitudes of donor and recipient about living kidney donation.(Alvaro et al J Health Commun 2010, Gordon et al Transplant Direct 2015, Gordon et al Prog Transplant 2014) Use of community health and language concordant advisors have also helped enlist organ donors. (Zaramo et al Transplant Proc 2008) These same educational efforts could be utilized for education in home dialysis.

Tackle mental health 

Screening for depression or anxiety may mitigate patients fears about performing dialysis independently. Addressing fears of social isolation- such as peer mentoring, or home dialysis programs- would be cost-effective options. (Cafazzo et al CJASN 2009) Home visits for patients on PD have been effective for patients with housing or transportation issues. (Castledine et al Neph Dial Transp 2013) One study found providing handyman services improved the living situation of older Black patients on hemodialysis (Crews et al Kidney Med 2019) – this may be effective in improving the barriers of care support facing many potential home dialysis patients.

More physicians passionate about home dialysis 

Improvements in provider enthusiasm, training and financial incentives may also improve access to home dialysis. Improvement in trainee education may improve physician enthusiasm and comfort with managing home dialysis. Further, incentivizing pre-dialysis education and physician payments for home dialysis are crucial.

Reimagine how to deliver home dialysis 

Changes in the care delivery model may be helpful for patients with housing and financial issues. Fund-assisted PD (PD at home with the aid of a PD-trained nurse) is currently performed in Canada, Denmark, and France. Fund- assisted PD addresses many issues, including physical barriers, social isolation problems, and lack of family support (Oliver et al CJASN 2020). Further, New Zealand offers community house dialysis programs (independent dialysis in a shared house) for those with unstable housing (Walker et al Kidney Med 2019). Smaller and more frequent supply deliveries may also mitigate space constraints. For those whose dialysis centers do not offer home dialysis, telehealth may ameliorate barriers to home dialysis access (Lew et al AJKD 2021). Financial constraints may be addressed by incentivizing patients or family members choosing the dialyze at home, which may include reimbursement for travel, or allowing for flexible training schedules. 

Figure 3. Figure from Weiner et al Kidney Med 2020: Socioeconomic Barriers to Home Dialysis and Potential Solutions


The racial inequities observed in home dialysis use are likely multifactorial due to patient, provider, and policy factors. Mitigating these factors are crucial to providing equitable care in order to meet the goals of the Advancing American Kidney Health executive order.

Reviewed by Matthew A. Sparks and Amy Yau

Leave a Reply